The pearl trader argued that even if considered rejects, these pearls had market value, particularly when imperfections affected less than half their surface and they could be commercially sold as cut cultured pearls.

The court acknowledged the quality control exercised by the Pearl Farming Department. However, it also ruled that the deprivation of property resulting from the pearl destruction warranted compensation under Article 17 of the 1789 Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen. The court concluded the company failed to prove the destroyed pearls could be partially repurposed for commercial use.

Consequently, the court ordered French Polynesia to pay EURL Raipoe International 10,297,782 FCFP in compensation for the property deprivation of 323,080 pearls destroyed on May 17, 2016.